Before I moved to Wales, back in 2014, I was once told that
on no account should I, or other incomers to Wales, waste their time learning
Welsh, because even if we were to meet Welsh-Speakers, it would be useless
since ‘everyone can speak English.’
That everyone speaks English is of course true, but it was
no deterrence to me I, and when Welsh Duolinguo came out about two years later,
I started at it the very next day, and haven’t looked back.
My view, of course, was contrary to the one I had
encountered back in 2014 – I believe that when in Rome you should do as the Romans.
But let’s take that argument, for one moment, that which
says that Welsh is useless because everyone speaks English. Well, what it’s saying seems to be this:
‘Thank you, Welsh-Speakers, for learning our language,
English. We are very grateful for that, and so your reward from us is
that we’re not going to bother to learn a word of your language when we choose to come and live amongst you
and if it makes the future of your language, culture and very identity less
safe, then so be it. If it makes you
feel like you’re the foreigner in your own country, then so be it.’
Not much of a reward is it? Unfortunately though, this
attitude is all too common - and what is the result of this?
Well, in many of the Welsh-Speaking communities that are still
left, you have shops and restaurants where English-speaking incomer staff haven’t
learnt a word of Welsh, meaning that the locals have to use their second language in order to survive in their own country,
as if the locals were the foreigners, and not the incomers themselves!
In London, my local baker happened to be Romanian, but that
did not mean that I had to speak Romanian if I wanted to buy something from
her!
But, of course, the much bigger result of English-Speaking
incomers not being assimilated by the locals in the Fro Gymraeg has been the disappearance of most of the Fro Gymraeg altogether!
Not only has the non-assimilation of incomers led to the collapse
of the Welsh Language, it has also, quite understandably, resulted in segregation,
parallel communities, and social tensions.
The 1989 A Study of Language Contact
And Social Networks in Ynys Môn, by Delyth Morris, proved exactly this, which looked specifically at the
village of Bryngwran, on Anglesey.
If there’s one corner of the British Isles where multiculturalism has failed, it’s with the
non-assimilation of English-speaking incomers in the Fro Gymraeg.
All this is not a reward – it’s a punishment – punishment for speaking
somebody else’s language so well.
And Welsh-speakers did not suffer this fate when they were still majority monoglot. Indeed, when you had English-speaking incomers
moving to majority Welsh monoglot communities in the 19th and early 20th
centuries, like Bethesda in 1911, the newcomers duly learned Welsh and were assimilated without any problems.
But, of course, in the 21st century, it’s not
just the Welsh who speak good English.
It’s the Germans, the Dutch, the Scandinavians, the South Koreans - you
get the picture. Now, this in itself is no bad thing, and I myself am an English teacher here in China.
But what is outrageous is that, like the Welsh, these countries are increasingly being punished for being good at English, as English-speakers who go and live in those countries feel increasingly tempted to take advantage of the locals' prowess in English and not bother learning the local language.
But what is outrageous is that, like the Welsh, these countries are increasingly being punished for being good at English, as English-speakers who go and live in those countries feel increasingly tempted to take advantage of the locals' prowess in English and not bother learning the local language.
In Berlin, you now have bars staffed by English-speakers who don’t speak a word of German, something which
has quite rightly caused outrage, while in Iceland, another
article from the guardian, remarked that “in the
bars, restaurants and shops of downtown Reykjavik, it can be a struggle for
locals to get served in their native language.”
Again, this was not something that happened in these countries before the locals learned good English, and thus in cities like Berlin, Amsterdam and Reykjavik, like in the Fro Gymraeg, the locals are being punished, being made to feel like foreigners on their own home turf, merely because they are good at somebody else's language - they are being punished for being well educated.
That is something that I find plain wrong, and is why I felt compelled to learn Welsh when in Wales,
and Chinese before I came to China, and why I have always felt compelled to
learn the local language wherever I plan to move to.
I also thus feel that there needs to be a fundamental change in attitude among English-Speakers
who move abroad. That was something I
felt in 2014, and its something I feel even more now.
Maybe you agree with me, maybe you don't, but either way, feel free to subscribe to my Facebook Page at https://www.facebook.com/PoliticsByRebuttal/ for more content.
Maybe you agree with me, maybe you don't, but either way, feel free to subscribe to my Facebook Page at https://www.facebook.com/PoliticsByRebuttal/ for more content.
Well observed and said
ReplyDeleteWell observed and said
ReplyDeleteAn ceart uilig agat!
ReplyDeleteYou are absolutely right!
Thank you, Diolch yn Fawr
ReplyDeleteThere are several points you are overlooking here:
ReplyDelete1. THE primary purpose of language is communication and, for that, one needs to have a common language.
2. People who say "When in someone else's country - then learn their language". Fine. I agree with you. But Wales is in Britain and is not a "foreign country". Or are you going to try and extend that point and say the second one moves across county boundaries one should learn the dialect of the particular county concerned? After all that would be consistent with such a thing. But no-one English (or Scottish or Irish) that moves elsewhere in Britain has moved to a foreign country. We've moved to a different area in our own country.
3. The insistence on the Welsh language is, in some areas, preventing firms moving here from elsewhere in the country and, with that, the extra jobs they would create don't happen. Of course - if one wants a one-way brain drain, then I couldnt think of a better way of making sure that happens (particularly for those employees the firm would bring with them that have/intend to have children and need an English language school for them - in order that they don't spend months not understanding the language they are being taught in and then falling behind their peers that haven't had that obstacle put in their way).
1. 'THE primary purpose of language is communication and, for that, one needs to have a common language' - Never, in this blog did I say that Welsh-Speakers should stop learning English. What I am saying though is that English-Speakers who move to Welsh-Speaking areas should not punish the locals for their good English for making it their reason for not learning Welsh.
DeleteYes Language is for communication and that may be true, but I have met people in mainland Europe who think that the Irish and Scots are all English and that both countries are just provinces of England. They would never have such thoughts about Estonia or Armenia being part of Russia. Why? Language. Saying that we should 'have a common language' is no reason for saying that countries that aren't England should be turned into England, or that non-native-English-Speakers should feel like foreigners in their own country.
2. "But no-one English (or Scottish or Irish) that moves elsewhere in Britain has moved to a foreign country. We've moved to a different area in our own country." Have you not heard of Switzerland, or South Africa, or Canada, or Belgium. These are countries that have different languages spoken within them. Are you saying that if a German moves from German-speaking Switzerland to French-Speaking Switzerland (in the same country) that they should have no obligation to learn the new language since he hasn't crossed any international border?
3. "The insistence on the Welsh language is, in some areas, preventing firms moving here from elsewhere in the country and, with that, the extra jobs they would create don't happen. Of course - if one wants a one-way brain drain, then I couldnt think of a better way of making sure that happens"
Erm. I again urge the commenter to look at Switzerland or Luxembourg - those countries have multiple official languages yet no banker in Switzerland has ever run away from Switzerland because of its many languages - no, in fact, Swtizerland and Luxembourg are countries that companies choose to move to.
Oh yeah right....and I like to keep our language up-to-date as well. "he hasnt crossed any international border" = 2010's substitution being "They haven't crossed any international border" (ie non-sexist language).
ReplyDeleteOne can only speak for one's own country and not foreign countries - unless one has actually lived in Switzerland (which I thought had rather a noticeable financial advantage or two compared to us for instance). We know what happens in Britain and how the Welsh part of our own country is getting "left behind" by missing out on firms that would otherwise have moved here.